1. They may be declared eligible to contest and participate in the election with right to vote.
2. The rejection of the nomination papers by the RO on the basis of Registrar's letter dated 25 Oct 2006 may kindly be declared illegal and set aside.
3. The RO may kindly be restrained to take any further action in pursuance to the Agenda Notice dated 30.07.2008. (Stop elections).
4. The proposed election, if held, on 23 Aug 2008 may kindly be declared null and void and a fresh election may kindly be ordered.
5. A direction may kindly be given to the RO to follow the list of valid members as provided by the Society for holding the election afresh.
6. The Society may kindly be directed to produce the original records in its custody as and when required by this Hon'ble Court.
7. Any other ....................................................................................................
The documents attached to their appeal includes the order of Civil Judge Shri Ashish Aggarwal in the Suit No 90/2007 dated 24 Mar 2007. That this order had been set aside by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi on 12 May 2008, has conveniently been concealed from the Cooperative Tribunal. In addition, there is a long list of inaccuracies in the appeal that will be published in this blog after that case is decided by the Cooperative Tribunal.
No comments:
Post a Comment